Remembering Dallas Willard (1935-2013): 5 of His Best Quotes

I remember where I was when I received and read my first Dallas Willard book. I was sitting by the window in my buddy Trent Henderson‘s office (which is now my office…for another week) at Highland Baptist Church in Waco, TX.

Trent asked me if I had read The Divine Conspiracy (DC) and I said no. He immediately rolled over to his computer, clicked on Amazon.com and ordered Willard’s complete works for me.

The books came in to Trent’s office two days later and I picked them up there and began reading DC. I have read it over and again in that same office. I have quotes from DC posted on my wall. I think about, talk about them, and have written about them at length. He has greatly informed my theology and my approach to pastoral ministry.  Needless to say, I am a Willard fan.

So I was sad yesterday to hear of his passing.  He was a great mind for the Kingdom and a great teacher for those of us who are passionate about making disciples of Jesus Christ.  If you have not read anything he has written, may I suggest that you begin with The Great Omission and then work your way to DC and then Renovation of The Heart.

In light of his passing, I want to share my five favorite Willard quotes from his writings:

  1. “Central to the understanding and proclamation of the Christian gospel today, as in Jesus’ day, is a re-visioning of what God’s own life is like and how the physical cosmos fits into it.”  - The Divine Conspiracy
  2. “We live in a culture that has, for centuries now, cultivated the idea that the skeptical person is always smarter than one who believes. You can almost be as stupid as a cabbage as long as you doubt.” ― Hearing God
  3. “Grace is not opposed to effort, it is opposed to earning. Earning is an attitude. Effort is an action. Grace, you know, does not just have to do with forgiveness of sins alone.” ― The Great Omission
  4. “The greatest issue facing the world today, with all its heartbreaking needs, is whether those who, by profession or culture, are identified as ‘Christians’ will become disciples – students, apprentices, practitioners – of Jesus Christ, steadily learning from him how to live the life of the Kingdom of the Heavens into every corner of human existence.” ― The Great Omission
  5. “The true saint burns grace like a 747 burns fuel on takeoff.” – The Great Omission

 

 309 Views

Posted in Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

Coming Out In America: Some Thoughts on Jason Collins, Chris Broussard, and Brittney Griner

I wanted to blog about this topic last month during the week that current NBA player Jason Collins announced via Sports Illustrated that he is gay.  But I didn’t feel that I had the right angle and instead opted to wait for the right time to post.

To be honest, I still don’t feel like I have the right angle but it’s way past time to respond — so here goes.  My thoughts are varied and scattered and so I organized them topically:

On Jason Collins

One might have expected a greater amount of fanfare with this revelation.  But his announcement was met with more of a polite golf clap than a stadium of applause.  Perhaps it is because he hasn’t been a relevant player in the league since the early 00s.  And he was relevant then.  He was a stellar high school and college player and anchored the NBA’s Nets’ defense during their back-to-back Eastern Conference titles.  But that was then and this is now.  Maybe this is why ESPN’s Chris Broussard’s comments about homosexuality have caused more drama than Collins’ admission.  In one sense, Collins is an afterthought free agent who lacks the star power and the headlines that this would bring if it were, say, LeBron James coming out.

Or, perhaps, being gay in America is frankly not that big of a deal anymore. Compare Collins’ announcement to that of Ellen DeGeneres circa 1997.  I remember it well.  It was scandalous.  She was vilified publicly and privately.  It was hell on earth and hardened her in many respects to media attention.  To describe Collins as “brave” is in many respects to tarnish what Ellen D did.  If Ellen was brave, then what word do we use to describe Collins’ announcement?  Next? Standard? Perhaps.  But there are even mixed perspectives from within the LGBT community and I think it is safe to say that Collins is no Ellen.  And I don’t think he wants to be.  That is perhaps why he was so overwhelmed with the media attention.

Chris Broussard, Sports Apologetics?

Speaking of media attention, did you catch the ESPN Outside The Lines segment on Collins and Broussard’s commentary?  Broussard is considered to be an up-and-coming NBA expert reporter with close contacts in NBA circles   When asked how some players were responding, Broussard offered a Christian player’s reaction and then reinforced the Biblical position on homosexual behavior and whether someone can be a Christian who practices homosexual intercourse with regularity:

. . . if you’re openly living in unrepentant sin, whatever it may be, not just homosexuality — adultery, fornication, premarital sex between heterosexuals — whatever it may be, I believe that’s walking in open rebellion to God and to Jesus Christ. So I would not characterize that person as a Christian because I don’t think the Bible would characterize them as a Christian.

Let me see if I can put Broussard’s commentary into context, while not trying to defend his approach.  Keep in mind that Broussard is colleagues with L.Z. Granderson, a brilliant young writer on sports and American culture who is openly gay.  Broussard was making public what he and Granderson have debated previously in private.  Broussard was not in attack mode, but seems to have been offering a Christian sports commentary in response to some of the statements that Collins made about his own Christian family values.  Collins said that he wanted “to march for tolerance, acceptance and understanding.”  Collins also said:

I’m from a close-knit family. My parents instilled Christian values in me. They taught Sunday school, and I enjoyed lending a hand. I take the teachings of Jesus seriously, particularly the ones that touch on tolerance and understanding. On family trips, my parents made a point to expose us to new things, religious and cultural. In Utah, we visited the Mormon Salt Lake Temple. In Atlanta, the house of Martin Luther King Jr. That early exposure to otherness made me the guy who accepts everyone unconditionally.

I think Broussard was trying to call attention to what tolerance is and what it is not.  Tolerance is the kind of relationship that Granderson and Broussard have, one where the two disagree on positions but still remain friends.  Collins seems to be confused on at least two issues in Broussard’s mind at least.  First, he wrongly believes that tolerance is equivalent to acceptance.  Second, he presumes that Christianity is a religion that accepts everyone unconditionally.  Broussard was trying to correct the false notion that Jesus accepts people unconditionally.  Jesus welcomes people unconditionally, but does not accept them unconditionally.  What about “taking up a cross” communicates blind acceptance?  I think this is what Broussard was trying to accomplish.  Whether he accomplished this or not, or whether his approach was correct is another story . . .

Brittney Griner

I am not certain why no one seems to be making more of first round WNBA draft pick Brittney Griner (a Baylor graduate) who also announced to Sports Illustrated that she is a practicing lesbian.  This got by with nary a whiff of shock or scandal.  Sure ESPN grabbed the headline, but that was about that.  It was not even on par with Jason Collins and certainly not on par with Ellen.  Brittney’s own attitude was fairly nonchalant about it as well.

I think the bigger story about Brittney’s admission is the ways in which Baylor fans have responded.  Keep in mind that Baylor Lady Bear fans are mostly older, white, politically conservative, evangelical Christians.  Notice what Baylor University did not do.  They did not:

  • Make a public announcement reenforcing the university’s position that homosexual behavior is a sin.  And they could have. The Princeton Review ranked Baylor as one of the 10 least gay-friendly universities in the nation.
  • Make a public announcement rapidly changing the university’s position to affirm homosexual behavior, identity, and community as an alternative but accepted and embraced lifestyle path for success.
  • Attempt to nuance, defend, or justify their traditional position.

Instead? Baylor stayed silent.  They didn’t make a fuss one way or another.  What is this position called?  It is called tolerance.  The university holds to a firm position.  They loved and will continue to love Brittney.  They don’t publicly condemn or accept her lifestyle path.  They simply love, educate, provide a scholarship for, feed, encourage, provide growth opportunities, and send off a fine student athlete.  And they do so…wait for it…because of the Love of Christ.

 740 Views

Posted in Culture, Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

A New Chapter For Me

Yesterday I had the privilege of telling my church family some exciting news for our family. I have accepted the call to become the teaching pastor at LifePoint Church in Plano, Texas. Our last Sunday with Highland will be on May 19th. My first Sunday with our new church family at LifePoint will be on June 2.

Below is an excerpt from the letter that I read to our Highland church family. You can read the whole thing in entirety here.

Even though we are excited about this opportunity, we are at the same time sad. Highland, y’all are an awesome church family and that fact makes this decision challenging for us. Natalie and I fell in love in the fellowship hall. Literally. I was chasing Joshua and Jacob Dunn and fell on top of Natalie in the fellowship hall. Kyle Dunn mentored me here and Edrena Smith mentored Natalie here. Barry Camp pulled me aside over by the staff entrance to the White House and told me that I should start dating Natalie. He was similarly pleased to perform our marriage ceremony. Tim Cates, Phil Stagg, and Amine Qourzal played music in our wedding and Mary Beth Talley and Lauren Butler helped with reception and greeting duties. Trent Henderson and Mark Wible mentored me in seminary. The Elders ordained me to ministry. They called us back here and offered me my first real grown up job in 2009. This group of staff members and Elders were the ones who prayed for Natalie and me during our struggle with infertility along with our connection group and Sunday school class. These same people met us at the hospital when our daughter was born. Highland is the church home where we will dedicate our daughter on Mother’s Day. It was the place where I was blessed enough to perform some of my first weddings, my first baptism, and my first funeral, and the place where I preached my first sermons.

Leaving here means leaving family. But, it also means leaving a job I really love. We do so much important Kingdom work together as a team of staff, elders, and volunteer leaders. I will miss this working environment. But I will also miss the little things about working for Highland. For example, I will miss starting my workday at Highland. I will miss pulling up to the Chapel on a crisp Waco morning with the Sun piercing through the Live Oaks on 30th and Maple Ave., walking into the White House, climbing the stairs up to my office on the second floor that overlooks a picturesque row of homes, putting a kettle of water on to boil, forgetting to clean my coffee mug, walking back down the stairs to the kitchen sink, rinsing out my mug, walking back up the stairs, pouring a cup of tea, booting up my computer, answering emails, realizing that I let the tea steep for far too long to the point of bitterness, drinking the tea anyway, and thanking God that I get to serve the church that I love.

426 Views

Posted in Ministry, Theology | Tagged , | 127 Comments

The Err Of Basketball Prosperity Theology: A Book Review Of The Leftovers by Matt Sayman

Matt Sayman’s autobiographical narrative The Leftovers: Basketball, Betrayal, Baylor, and Beyond is many things.  It is first and foremost an insider’s account of the Baylor basketball scandal of 2003.  Patrick Dennehey’s murder was heartbreaking; Carlton Dotson’s involvement was horrifying; and Coach Dave Bliss’s coverup was dumbfounding. The book is also an account of those who were understandably displaced by this tragedy — guard Matt Sayman, guard Terrance Thomas, and Forward R.T. Guinn. They had come to Baylor with optimism and hope.  Against the backdrop of this horrible tragedy, they had to face a hopeless situation.  But most importantly, The Leftovers is a testimony about the shallow, evil, destructive, and disillusioning nature of prosperity theology.

In full disclosure – I know Matt Sayman, or at least I knew him.  We had a Spanish class together our freshman year with Señora Ochoa. I remember chatting with him a few times during the course of that first semester in the Fall of 2000.  Perhaps this is why I found Matt to be a fitting tour guide through the story of Baylor University in the early 2000s.  In the first few chapters we can tell that Sayman lives the life of a basketball worshipper.  Although he came to Christ at an early age, Sayman admits that his worldview foundation was shaped more by Pistol Pete homework basketball videos and less by the Bible that Pistol Pete later embraced upon his own conversion.  One gets the sense that Matt believed in a kind of basketball prosperity gospel.  As he stated early on, “If my relationship with God was good, then my basketball game was good.”

This basketball prosperity theology proved to be a stable theology throughout his basketball career, a career that began in the small town of Berwick, Pennsylvania where he was a local basketball hero and continued into The Colony High School in Texas, where Sayman shined as an elite player.  Sayman was good enough to earn a division 1 scholarship offer from Dave Bliss at Baylor University, where his up and down successes with the men’s basketball team through his first three years at Baylor served to reinforce his theological framework: if you obey God, good things will happen on the court and in life.  Sayman’s theology seems to be additionally reinforced through his friendship with Jessika Stratton, a standout player for Baylor’s women’s team and a committed Christian.  Together, they embodied the ideal Baylor basketball student athletes — standouts on the court and in the game of life.

But then, the narrative takes a dark turn.  Tragedy struck during the summer of 2003 pushing Sayman to reexamine his theology, asking, “Why did this happen to me? I didn’t do anything wrong. And I am suffering for it.” Basketball prosperity theology was exposed for the fraud that it is.  Stunned by this revelation, Matt writes, “It [basketball] had been the idol of my life.”  Freshly disillusioned, Sayman turned to binge drinking, partying, and casual sex as a way of coping with his upended worldview.  As we find out in the afterward, these coping mechanisms slowly morphed into habits that robbed his life and his first marriage of the joy that God intended for them.

At one particular party, Matt describes a drunken encounter with Jess Stratton and the subsequent tear-filled conversation she had with him about the state of his life.  This was the low point in the story.  With the arrival of a new coach (Scott Drew) and a deceptively impressive 8-21 record, Sayman finally came to peace with his basketball journey.  He had not achieved his goal of reaching the NCAA tournament. However, he had found victory in readjusting his goals.  ”How many other teams could win 8 games, beat Texas A&M twice, and not finish in last place in their conference with only 7 scholarship players?” Sayman bragged.

Sayman used the events after his college career to finally address some of his inner demons.  A failed marriage, a stellar overseas career, and a litany of late night binge drinking experiences led to a sober realization at the ripe age of 30.  Matt gave up drinking and partying, was befriended by a local pastor, joined that pastor’s local church, and got married to a godly woman.  By the end of the narrative, we find that Matt Sayman needed this writing project as a way to put his basketball journey into a proper Biblical perspective, one that had matured from the naive basketball prosperity theology of his youth.

The Leftovers functions partly as an act of catharsis and partly as a spiritual discipline for Sayman.  Along the way, he grants readers access to a behind-the-scenes account of the the story of Baylor basketball.  It is in his story telling that Sayman’s communication ability is fully appreciated.  Matt is judicious in the way he portrays his characters.  Dave Bliss, for example, emerges as a complex figure who is both a Bible reading, FCA preacher as well as a cussing, hard-driving, coach with anger issues.  Scott Drew, on the other hand, comes off as an initially mercurial, but ultimately genuine father figure, who, along with his staff, helps to establish a nurturing basketball program that trains future leaders. Sayman, again, opts for a balanced honesty in the way he treats teammates with John Lucas III described as a brilliant player and a difficult teammate, and with Terrance Thomas beginning as selfish and troubled, but ending up as an exemplar human being and player.  And when particularly incriminating events need to be expressed, Sayman opts for confidentiality against the opportunity to dish.  In one scene during Drew’s first year, Matt prefers to keep a teammate’s name hidden from print, since the teammate is drinking wine coolers before practice. A nice touch, if you ask me.

Sayman should also be lauded for his wry sense of humor. For example, when asked to speak to the media immediately following the scandal, Sayman ponders aloud in a perfect Seinfeldian way, “I wonder what the proper dress code would be for the dissolving of a program press conference.” Part of the appeal of this book is that Sayman lives up to his name.  He says with judicious filter what all men would be thinking if pressed into a similar situation, and he delivers with a keen comedic timing.

Matt Sayman’s The Leftovers provides a readable history of the good and then bad and then good years of Baylor basketball from 2000-2004 and beyond.  Sayman is a capable narrator of the ins and outs of college life, college basketball, and the quest to find meaning and our place in this world.  In the end, his life story helps preach the good news that this meaning and place is found best, not in basketball, but in Jesus Christ.

 743 Views

Posted in Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Was Abram The First Gang Leader?

abrahamI was reading through Genesis 14 today and discovered a new facet of a familiar passage.  Funny how The Lord does that.

Here is how the passage begins…

Then one who had escaped came and told Abram the Hebrew [that his nephew Lot had been captured], who was living by the oaks of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and of Aner. These were allies of Abram.

Having not read ahead, how would you expect the Bible story character Abram to respond?  Did he:

A: Go find a lonely spot to pray?
B: Go talk with the rival King and beg for mercy?
C: None of the above?

Answer: C

The passage continues:

When Abram heard that his kinsman had been taken captive, he led forth his trained men, born in his house, 318 of them, and went in pursuit as far as Dan. And he divided his forces against them by night, he and his servants, and defeated them and pursued them to Hobah, north of Damascus. Then he brought back all the possessions, and also brought back his kinsman Lot with his possessions, and the women and the people.

Did you catch that?  Abram had a posse.  318 of them.  And when his homeboy Lot got snatched by a rival, Abram turned to his crew and responded in the following way (so I imagine):

Fact: Abram had a crew.  He stepped to some boys who dissed and dismissed his family.  It was personal and he took action.

I am not suggesting what Abram did was something that we need to practice today.  I am actually against this form of violent action.  What I am suggesting is that this is a perfect example of how our kid-friendly Bible theology sometimes shields us from the gritty reality of God’s providence.

The truth is, Abram was a powerful man who had resources and personal wealth that could be and was often used to get his way as he navigated through the transient context of the Ancient Near East.  I think it is helpful to remember that YHWH did not call an already sanctified man into a covenant relationship.  YHWH called a fallen man into a covenant relationship.  He took a patriarchal gang leader and sanctified him into God-fearing, humble, patriarch.

And the truth of God’s Word is that the same God still does this amazing work of sanctification today, through His Son Jesus Christ.

 303 Views

Posted in Culture, Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Remembering Roger Ebert

Roger Ebert is dead at the age of 70, so the Chicago Sun-Times tells us.

His death is a milestone for me.  It dates me as someone who grew up is the area of the venn diagram where two generations overlap — the Gen-Xers and the Millennials.  For many of us, Roger Ebert wasn’t merely a film critic.  He was the film critic (along with Gene Siskel) that determined what was good and bad in the theatre.

I remember the first time I watched a Roger Ebert film review.  It was 1990 and Home Alone starring child prodigy  had just come to the theatre in my home town.  I told my dad that I wanted to see the film and he did what any other red-blooded American man would do before taking his nine-year old kid to see a movie — he watched Siskel and Ebert’s review.

They gave it a thumbs down.

Ebert thought the entire premise of the film was silly. He said the plot missed an opportunity to convey the ensuing terror of a scenario in which an eight-year old kid was left at home alone.  I remember my dad looking at me and asking, “Are you SURE you really want to see this movie?”  I remained steadfast in my film selection and we ended up seeing the movie anyways.

But Roger Ebert could have blown it for me that night.  And I have held a grudge ever since for that particular review.  How could he and Siskel have missed the genius of Home Alone?

  • It is the greatest Christmas film about a kid who is home alone in a suburb of Chicago of all time.
  • It made $476,684,675 at the box office.
  • It spawned a sequel that literally recycled the plot, characters  and sight gags, changed only the setting (New York, not Chicago…Totally different), and still made $358,994,850 at the box office.
  • And, it spawned a third installment that was terrible, as well as a fourth installment that went straight to video.  Not DVD. Video.

Despite my clear difference of opinion on the merits of Home Alone, I still turned to Roger Ebert’s movie reviews before watching nearly every movie I have ever seen.  He was my movie litmus test.  Conversations always seemed to follow this evaluation sequence:

  • Ebert gave it one star – we can rent it during that boring weekend in November.
  • Ebert gave it two stars – we may need to rent it at blockbuster this weekend.
  • Ebert gave it three stars – we should plan a date night to go watch it in the theater.
  • Ebert gave it four stars – I don’t care if we have to face traffic and high school kids texting, I WILL SEE THIS MOVIE.
  • Siskel and Ebert gave it two enthusiastic thumbs up – There is no discussion to be had . . . we are watching this film at least four times in the next two days.

And that was the thing about Roger Ebert. He was an irreplaceable cog in the film experience process.  He was the kind of writer that you could learn from even if you disagreed with him. Whether he ultimately liked or hated a particular film was not as important to me the fact that he reviewed them.  I always knew when a bad film was worth watching or a good film was worth avoiding based on his reviews. This was, perhaps, his legacy with my generation.

In reality, Home Alone is kind of a silly movie.  And that is okay for me to admit now because I am comfortable with the fact that I enjoy silly movies.  I feel the same way about Billy Madison, Tommy Boy, The Wedding Singer, and Dumb and Dumber.  Not coincidentally, Ebert gave thumbs down to all of them.  But by the late 90s, I knew that an Ebert thumbs down to a comedy meant that I would like it.  And I needed to know that before purchasing a movie ticket.

I am going to miss Roger Ebert and his reviews.  There is a great void in my film watching experience.  Sure, other writers can tell me their take.  Rotten Tomatoes can help me gauge popular perception.  But nothing will replace the functional role of Roger Ebert and his thumbs.

Here’s two thumbs up for your life Roger.

 321 Views

Posted in Culture | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

The Lost Art of Teachability

“Actions always have consequences.”
Joel and Ethan Cohen, A Serious Man

In late February Coach Nick Saban helmed a presser in which he discussed the recent arrests and subsequent dismissal of four freshman from the Alabama Crimson Tide football team.  When pressed by a reporter as to his reasoning for their dismissal, Saban told him plainly:

Some people learn by words.
Some people can learn by consequences.
Some people can’t learn.

I found that particular statement to be a fascinating data point in the current of 21st century American culture.  Although everybody has an aversion to negative consequences, it seems like many of us will do anything but learn from these consequences, as Saban has suggested.  Consider these pressing issues.

The Debt Crisis

The average American owes better than $40,000 in consumer debt, with a standard credit card limit of somewhere around $5,000 per card or $19,000 spread across multiple cards.  Put those figures into perspective.  This means that many American consumers spend more than they make, receive a bill telling them of the consequence of their overspending, and then decide to continue the pattern of over spending.  Or as Wimpy from Popeye would say, “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” By spreading consumer debt across multiple credit cards consumers hope to avoid or delay consequences.

Individually Customized Religion 

Have you heard about the latest trend in religious beliefs?  Starting in 2011 George Barna’s book Futurecast revealed some interesting trends.  Americans want to pick and choose their own religious identity and no longer feel compelled to adhere to received systems of religious thought. Perhaps you have been in an argument with a close friend who on the surface appears to be Christian, but who behaves in a way that is far from Biblical.  Perhaps you might have even found this person to be “slippery” in conversation — opting to change the rules of argument rather than engage with you in a consistent manner.

This type of customizable approach to religion was made famous in Rob Bell’s 2011 work Love Wins (see my full review here) wherein, Mr. Bell attempted to open up fresh dialogue about whether Christians should continue teaching that hell is a place that is real or whether the Bible definitively says that non-believers will go there if they die apart from Jesus’ saving grace.

His argument takes on the following logic:

  • I like the idea of Jesus being loving.
  • I like the idea of people who believe in Jesus while on Earth going to heaven.
  • I don’t like the idea of people who hate, dismiss, or deny Jesus on earth going to hell.
    ———————————–
  • Therefore, I am going to remove the possibility of hell from my theology.  This way, I get all the good stuff of Jesus and love and heaven and none of the consequence of hell.

Part of the appeal of the choose your own religion attitude is that it permits adherents to deny consequences.

Colorado Pot Laws

Along with Washington state, Colorado recently legalized what had become common practice among adults – recreational pot consumption.  As with the decision to end prohibition, early proponents have legalized pot with some sense of trepidation, knowing that more longitudinal research is needed to confirm whether this was a good idea. And on cue, the San Jose Mercury News is reporting that cases of accidental child ingestion of pot have dramatically increased since 2009, a direct consequence of Colorado’s lenient culture of pot consumption.  The response by Colorado doctors and public policy shapers has been to manage or regulate the consequences of lenient statewide pot use.  There is a pending process for access for adults and doctors are pushing for tamper proof packaging for children, get this, because doctors still classify pot as poisonous for children.  It should be noted that this is the same logic used for parents who consume alcohol with children in the house.  But I would ask, “How has that approach worked out for us?” It has been a failure says recent studies.  Not that I have all the answers — I just want to point out that managing consequences may not be the best approach.

Steve Martin penned a wonderful autobiography entitled Born Standing Up, in which he describes his generation’s approach to denying, delaying, and managing the consequences of the 1960s.  While he lamented the moment when women got wise to men’s true intentions with intercourse, I found his comments about drug use to be a redemptive twist in the story.  After one particular night of smoking pot and going to a movie theater, Martin had an anxiety attack that frightened him and left him thinking he was going to have a heart attack and die.  Upon sobering up, Martin reflected on the event  (p. 107):

After a few weeks a list of triggers developed.  I couldn’t go back into a movie theater, and I didn’t for at least ten years. I never smoked pot again, or got involved with the era’s preoccupation with illicit substances (I’m sure this event helped me avoid the scourge of cocaine).

Martin’s testimony is that consequences can be helpful boundaries that guide us away from dangerous behavior and ideas.  I think the church would be wise to take Nick Saban’s advice and learn from the words of others.  The best place to begin is by learning from the Word of God.  A good place to start might be to memorize the words of Proverbs 22:3, “The prudent sees danger and hides himself, but the simple go on and suffer for it.”

And yet, as Christians we are still mired by the Fall and will not be perfect until heaven.  Thus, in this Christian life we will make mistakes and there will still be consequences.  But, consequences for mistakes don’t have to derail our walk.  They can be good things that help us to stay on the straight and narrow.  Once we become aware of our consequences we would be wise, again, to follow the advice of Nick Saban and learn from our consequences.542 Views

Posted in Culture, Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Recapping The Gay Marriage Conversation On The Blog Last Week

Last week a little post I wrote on how Christians might respond to the question of homosexual marriage went viral. Like 280,000 views in the first 50 hours viral. The blog post was popular enough to get picked up by my friends at Christ and Pop Culture magazine and got some traction there. The story was also picked up by a local paper, The Waco Tribune Herald. Finally, a local radio station interviewed me about the blog post during a popular local morning show.

In light of this overwhelming response there are a few folks I need to thank:

1) The Triune God. Thanks for opening some doors so that Your Bible could be proclaimed. Wherever this blog post went the truth of Your Word was lifted up. Well played, Jesus. Well played!

2) Everyone who shared the post on facebook, twitter, and other forms of social media. All 260,000 of you. This post got traction because friends and friends of friends and friends of friends of friends shared this post. Obviously my readers are the best readers in the world, with impeccable tastes in online content, and probably the most holy, sanctified Christians on the planet. Thanks for all y’all did to put this post out there. And, please keep sharing.

3) Everyone who read this post and lovingly sent back some critical pushback via comments and social media posts. Several astute Christians pointed out that my exegesis of Ephesians 4:15 needed more nuancing, since the immediate context for Paul was the community of believers. Yep, I needed to clarify. Also, several other commenters noted how curt I was with my comments about Rob Bell’s accommodating tendencies. That was spot on. My Catholic readers pointed out that I was a bit Protestant-heavy in my reading of Scripture. True. Thanks to all of your comments. They helped to keep me humble and accountable to the Church. Keep the comments coming.

Many readers have noted the lack of readable content on the Christian way of responding politically to the Gay Marriage debate. I would humbly point readers towards two articles that aim to equip believers on how to think, pray about, evangelize, and engage gay friends for the Gospel within the political debate.

1. Are Gay Rights the New Civil Rights? A black Christian theologian and pastor addresses the claim that gay rights and civil rights operate under similar merits.

2. The Persuasive Arguments for Gay Marriage? A pastor talks honestly about the appeals for the political arguments for gay marriage and where the appeals fall short.

 436 Views

Posted in Culture, Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

How To Not Take Easter For Granted

Maybe you are like me.  Maybe after having been a Christian for more than a year you have been struggling with taking the various holy days for granted:

Christmas? Been there done that. Oh, wait, we are lighting the candles now?  Oh, Okay.  Oh, now we are raising them to the ceiling?  Nice.  Say, how much longer until we turn these things back into the deacons and go home and open presents? 

Good Friday? Check. A day off from work and school.  Thanks Jesus.

Easter Sunday? I’ve seen The Passion Of The Christ film, what more is there to explain to me?  And by the way, I totally saw that ending coming. 

This struggle with the significance of these special days is such a drastic contrast with my first year of being a Christian.  I couldn’t wait to celebrate the birth of Jesus afresh.  I dreaded Good Friday because of the deep sense of sorrow I felt. And Easter – I partied like it was 33AD.

Sound familiar to anyone reading this sentence?

Having recognized this tendency towards lethargy, I came up with a strategy to help me reengage the holy seasons. I want to pass it onto those reading this sentence.  The strategy comes from an unlikely source: Church History.

Historians will often ask What If questions as a way to understand the significance of particular events.  For example: “How would the American church be different if . . . if Abraham Lincoln was never assassinated?” Or, “if John Wesley died during childbirth?” Or, “If Columbus had speedboats like in that GEICO commercial?”

Recently, I took our church through this exercise during Christmas by asking, “What if Jesus had never come to earth as a human baby?”  The worship service was incredible.  And it made for a truly meaningful Christmas season.  In this post, I want to point readers to the same question, but to imagine it for the Easter season.

So here is the question:  What if Jesus never came?  Or, what if He was only a good moral teacher who lived a good life and died on that Friday in Jerusalem, never to be resurrected?  How might the world history of humanity be different?

IfJEsusNeverCame

243 Views

Posted in Culture, Ministry, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments